An intermediate appeals court in Maryland recently joined the ranks of other jurisdictions in finding broad coverage available for additional insureds under standard policy language.
This case is important: not only is it the first time a Maryland court has interpreted the 2004 version of the additional insured endorsement, but the holding also continues a trend of courts against limiting the endorsement’s “caused, in whole or in part” language to vicarious liability.
The full case alert is available here.
Nov 16, 2015
Grace V. Hebbel