Navigation

Not So Unambiguous: California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Additional Insured

In early September, California, again, proved itself to be a pro-policyholder state, in a recent court of appeal decision.  The court of appeal stated that manuscript additional insured endorsement language which provided coverage, “but only with respect to liability arising out of ‘your work’ and only as respects ongoing operations . . .” and “but only with respect to liability arising out of ‘your work’ which is ongoing . . . .”, did not unambiguously foreclose coverage for completed operations.

To view the full case alert, click here.

MRM

Malcolm Ranger-Murdock

 

Oct 05, 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *