In early September, California, again, proved itself to be a pro-policyholder state, in a recent court of appeal decision. The court of appeal stated that manuscript additional insured endorsement language which provided coverage, “but only with respect to liability arising out of ‘your work’ and only as respects ongoing operations . . .” and “but only with respect to liability arising out of ‘your work’ which is ongoing . . . .”, did not unambiguously foreclose coverage for completed operations.
To view the full case alert, click here.
Oct 05, 2017