Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

A subcontractor’s insurer refused to defend a general contractor even though they were named additional insured on its CGL Policy. Where does the insurer’s duty to defend begin? Where does it end? Click here to read our latest Case Alert to find out how the Supreme Court of Oregon reaffirms its stance on what is an insurer’s duty to defend.

Theresa Guertin-1 for web

Tifanny Casanova-2 for web

Jan 13, 2017
Theresa A. Guertin Tiffany Casanova

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *